English

Discerning Dark Energy Models with High-Redshift Standard Candles

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2017-09-20 v1

Abstract

Following the success of type Ia supernovae in constraining cosmologies at lower redshift (z2)(z\lesssim2), effort has been spent determining if a similarly useful standardisable candle can be found at higher redshift. {In this work we determine the largest possible magnitude discrepancy between a constant dark energy Λ\LambdaCDM cosmology and a cosmology in which the equation of state w(z)w(z) of dark energy is a function of redshift for high redshift standard candles (z2)(z\gtrsim2)}. We discuss a number of popular parametrisations of w(z)w(z) with two free parameters, wzw_zCDM cosmologies, including the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder and generalisation thereof, nnCPL, as well as the Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan parametrisation. For each of these parametrisations we calculate and find extrema of Δμ\Delta \mu, the difference between the distance modulus of a wzw_zCDM cosmology and a fiducial Λ\LambdaCDM cosmology as a function of redshift, given 68\% likelihood constraints on the parameters P=(Ωm,0,w0,wa)P=(\Omega_{m,0}, w_0, w_a). The parameters are constrained using cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, and type Ia supernovae data using CosmoMC. We find that none of the tested cosmologies can deviate more than 0.05 mag from the fiducial Λ\LambdaCDM cosmology at high redshift, implying that high redshift standard candles will not aid in discerning between a wzw_zCDM cosmology and the fiducial Λ\LambdaCDM cosmology. Conversely, this implies that if high redshift standard candles are found to be in disagreement with Λ\LambdaCDM at high redshift, then this is a problem not only for Λ\LambdaCDM but for the entire family of wzw_zCDM cosmologies.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1706.08530,
  title  = {Discerning Dark Energy Models with High-Redshift Standard Candles},
  author = {Per Andersen and Jens Hjorth},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.08530},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

9 pages, 4 figues. Submitted to MNRAS