English

Dimension Data, Local and Global Conjugacy in Reductive Groups

Representation Theory 2007-07-23 v2 Number Theory

Abstract

Let G be a connected reductive group (over C\mathbb{C}) and H a connected semisimple subgroup. The dimension data of H (realative to its given embedding in G) is the collection of the numbers {dimVH}\{{\rm dim} V^{H}\}, where V runs over all the finite dimensional representations of G. By a Theorem of Larsen-Pink ([L-P90]), the dimension data determines H up to isomorphism, and if G = GL (n) even up to conjugacy. Professor Langlands raised the question as to whether the strong (conjugacy) result holds for arbitrary G. In this paper We provided the following (negative) answer: If H is simple of type A_{4 n}, B2n(n2)B_{2 n} (n \geq 2), C2n(n2)C_{2 n} (n \geq 2), E_{6}, E_{8}, F_{4} and G_{2}, then there exist (for suitable NN) pairs of embeddings i and i' of H into G=SO(2N)G = SO (2 N) such that there image i (H) and i' (H) have the same dimension data but are not conjugate. In fact we have shown that i (H) and i' (H) are \emph{locally conjugate}, i.e., that i (h) and i' (h) are conjugate in G for all semisimple hHh \in H. If one assumes functoriality, this result will furnish the failure of multiplicity one for automorphic forms on such G over global fields. Such things are known in the disconnected cases, especially when H is finite, as in the works of Blasius [Blasius94] for SL(n)(n3)SL (n) (n \geq 3) and Gan-Gurevich-Jiang2002 ([Gan]) for G_{2}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0707.0144,
  title  = {Dimension Data, Local and Global Conjugacy in Reductive Groups},
  author = {Song Wang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0707.0144},
  year   = {2007}
}

Comments

(July 21st): Slight revision

R2 v1 2026-06-21T08:54:13.103Z