English

Differential Privacy of Quantum and Quantum-Inspired Classical Recommendation Algorithms

Quantum Physics 2026-02-27 v2 Cryptography and Security Emerging Technologies Machine Learning

Abstract

We study the differential privacy (DP) of the quantum recommendation algorithm of Kerenidis--Prakash and its quantum-inspired classical counterpart. Under standard low-rank and incoherence assumptions on the preference matrix, we show that the randomness already present in the algorithms' measurement/2\ell_2-sampling steps can act as a privacy-curating mechanism, yielding (ε,δ)(\varepsilon,\delta)-DP without injecting additional DP noise through the interface. Concretely, for a system with mm users and nn items and rank parameter kk, we prove ε=O(k/n)\varepsilon=\mathcal O(\sqrt{k/n}) and δ=O(k2/min2{m,n})\delta= \mathcal O\big(k^2/\min^2\{m,n\}\big); in the typical regime k=polylog(m,n)k=\mathrm{polylog}(m,n) this simplifies to ε=O~(1/n)\varepsilon=\tilde{\mathcal O}(1/\sqrt n) and δ=O~(1/min2{m,n})\delta=\tilde{\mathcal O}\big(1/\min^2\{m,n\}\big). Our analysis introduces a perturbation technique for truncated SVD under a single-entry update, which tracks the induced change in the low-rank reconstruction while avoiding unstable singular-vector comparisons. Finally, we validate the scaling on real-world rating datasets and compare against classical DP recommender baselines.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2502.04758,
  title  = {Differential Privacy of Quantum and Quantum-Inspired Classical Recommendation Algorithms},
  author = {Chenjian Li and Mingsheng Ying and Ji Guan},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04758},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

18 pages, 3 figures in total(including appendix)

R2 v1 2026-06-28T21:35:51.854Z