English

Differential analysis of incompressibility in neutron-rich nuclei

Nuclear Theory 2021-09-10 v2 High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena Nuclear Experiment

Abstract

Both the incompressibility \Ka of a finite nucleus of mass A and that (KK_{\infty}) of infinite nuclear matter are fundamentally important for many critical issues in nuclear physics and astrophysics. While some consensus has been reached about the KK_{\infty}, accurate theoretical predictions and experimental extractions of KτK_{\tau} characterizing the isospin dependence of \Ka have been very difficult. We propose a differential approach to extract the \Kt and \Ki independently from the \Ka data of any two nuclei in a given isotope chain. Applying this new method to the \Ka data from isoscalar giant monopole resonances (ISGMR) in even-even Pb, Sn, Cd and Ca isotopes taken by U. Garg {\it et al.} at the Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Osaka University, Japan, we find that the 106^{106}Cd-116^{116}Cd and 112^{112}Sn-124^{124}Sn pairs having the largest differences in isospin asymmetries in their respective isotope chains measured so far provide consistently the most accurate up-to-date \Kt value of Kτ=616±59K_{\tau}=-616\pm 59 MeV and Kτ=623±86K_{\tau}=-623\pm 86 MeV, respectively, largely independent of the remaining uncertainties of the surface and Coulomb terms in expanding the KAK_{\rm A}, while the KK_{\infty} values extracted from different isotopes chains are all well within the current uncertainty range of the community consensus for KK_{\infty}. Moreover, the size and origin of the "Soft Sn Puzzle" is studied with respect to the "Stiff Pb Phenomenon". It is found that the latter is favored due to a much larger (by 380\sim 380 MeV) \Kt for Pb isotopes than for Sn isotopes, while the \Ki from analyzing the \Ka data of Sn isotopes is only about 5 MeV less than that from analyzing the Pb data.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2102.10683,
  title  = {Differential analysis of incompressibility in neutron-rich nuclei},
  author = {Bao-An Li and Wen-Jie Xie},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10683},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

More discussions added. Phys. Rev. C in press