English

Differences in baryonic and dark matter scaling relations of galaxy clusters: A comparison between IllustrisTNG simulations and observations

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2025-06-18 v2

Abstract

We compare the self-similar baryonic mass fraction scaling relations between galaxy clusters from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SPT-SZ) survey and the IllustrisTNG state-of-the-art magnetohydrodynamical cosmological simulations. Using samples of 218 (TNG100) and 1605 (TNG300) friends-of-friends (FoF) haloes within 0.0z1.50.0 \leq z \leq 1.5 and M200c7×1013MM_{200c} \geq 7 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}, we fit the scaling relations using Simple Power Law (SPL), Broken Power Law (BPL), and General Double Power Law (GDPL) models through non-linear least squares regression. The SPL model reveals null slopes for the baryonic fraction as a function of redshift, consistent with self-similarity. Observations and simulations agree within 12σ1{-}2\sigma, suggesting comparable baryonic scaling slopes. We identify \sim13.8-14.1 per cent of baryons as "missing", primarily in the form of intracluster light (ICL) across all halo masses and warm gas in low-mass haloes. High-mass haloes (log10(M500c/M)14\log_{10}(M_{500c}/M_{\odot}) \geq 14) adhere to self-similarity, while low-mass haloes exhibit deviations, with the breakpoint occurring at log10(M500c/M)14\log_{10}(M_{500c}/M_{\odot}) \sim 14, where baryons are redistributed to the outskirts. Our findings suggest that the undetected warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) and baryon redistribution by feedback mechanisms are complementary solutions to the "missing baryon" problem.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2504.20159,
  title  = {Differences in baryonic and dark matter scaling relations of galaxy clusters: A comparison between IllustrisTNG simulations and observations},
  author = {Daniel Miller and Diego Pallero and Patricia B. Tissera and Matías Blaña},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20159},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in A&A; 17 pages, 7 figures, 5 tables, 1 appendix