English

Deterministic Dynamic Matching In Worst-Case Update Time

Data Structures and Algorithms 2021-11-22 v3

Abstract

We present deterministic algorithms for maintaining a (3/2+ϵ)(3/2 + \epsilon) and (2+ϵ)(2 + \epsilon)-approximate maximum matching in a fully dynamic graph with worst-case update times O^(n)\hat{O}(\sqrt{n}) and O~(1)\tilde{O}(1) respectively. The fastest known deterministic worst-case update time algorithms for achieving approximation ratio (2δ)(2 - \delta) (for any δ>0\delta > 0) and (2+ϵ)(2 + \epsilon) were both shown by Roghani et al. [2021] with update times O(n3/4)O(n^{3/4}) and Oϵ(n)O_\epsilon(\sqrt{n}) respectively. We close the gap between worst-case and amortized algorithms for the two approximation ratios as the best deterministic amortized update times for the problem are Oϵ(n)O_\epsilon(\sqrt{n}) and O~(1)\tilde{O}(1) which were shown in Bernstein and Stein [SODA'2021] and Bhattacharya and Kiss [ICALP'2021] respectively. In order to achieve both results we explicitly state a method implicitly used in Nanongkai and Saranurak [STOC'2017] and Bernstein et al. [arXiv'2020] which allows to transform dynamic algorithms capable of processing the input in batches to a dynamic algorithms with worst-case update time. \textbf{Independent Work:} Independently and concurrently to our work Grandoni et al. [arXiv'2021] has presented a fully dynamic algorithm for maintaining a (3/2+ϵ)(3/2 + \epsilon)-approximate maximum matching with deterministic worst-case update time Oϵ(n)O_\epsilon(\sqrt{n}).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2108.10461,
  title  = {Deterministic Dynamic Matching In Worst-Case Update Time},
  author = {Peter Kiss},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10461},
  year   = {2021}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-24T05:21:54.577Z