Detecting Objectifying Language in Online Professor Reviews
Abstract
Student reviews often make reference to professors' physical appearances. Until recently RateMyProfessors.com, the website of this study's focus, used a design feature to encourage a "hot or not" rating of college professors. In the wake of recent #MeToo and #TimesUp movements, social awareness of the inappropriateness of these reviews has grown; however, objectifying comments remain and continue to be posted in this online context. We describe two supervised text classifiers for detecting objectifying commentary in professor reviews. We then ensemble these classifiers and use the resulting model to track objectifying commentary at scale. We measure correlations between objectifying commentary, changes to the review website interface, and teacher gender across a ten-year period.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2010.08540,
title = {Detecting Objectifying Language in Online Professor Reviews},
author = {Angie Waller and Kyle Gorman},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08540},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
To appear at the 6th Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text, a workshop of EMNLP 2020