English

Detecting AutoAttack Perturbations in the Frequency Domain

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2024-02-21 v3 Cryptography and Security

Abstract

Recently, adversarial attacks on image classification networks by the AutoAttack (Croce and Hein, 2020b) framework have drawn a lot of attention. While AutoAttack has shown a very high attack success rate, most defense approaches are focusing on network hardening and robustness enhancements, like adversarial training. This way, the currently best-reported method can withstand about 66% of adversarial examples on CIFAR10. In this paper, we investigate the spatial and frequency domain properties of AutoAttack and propose an alternative defense. Instead of hardening a network, we detect adversarial attacks during inference, rejecting manipulated inputs. Based on a rather simple and fast analysis in the frequency domain, we introduce two different detection algorithms. First, a black box detector that only operates on the input images and achieves a detection accuracy of 100% on the AutoAttack CIFAR10 benchmark and 99.3% on ImageNet, for epsilon = 8/255 in both cases. Second, a whitebox detector using an analysis of CNN feature maps, leading to a detection rate of also 100% and 98.7% on the same benchmarks.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2111.08785,
  title  = {Detecting AutoAttack Perturbations in the Frequency Domain},
  author = {Peter Lorenz and Paula Harder and Dominik Strassel and Margret Keuper and Janis Keuper},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.08785},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

accepted at ICML 2021 workshop for robustness

R2 v1 2026-06-24T07:41:23.504Z