Democratizing Music Therapy: LLM-Based Automated EEG Analysis and Progress Tracking for Low-Cost Home Devices
Abstract
Home-based music therapy devices require accessible and cost-effective solutions for users to understand and track their therapeutic progress. Traditional physiological signal analysis, particularly EEG interpretation, relies heavily on domain experts, creating barriers to scalability and home adoption. Meanwhile, few experts are capable of interpreting physiological signal data while also making targeted music recommendations. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in various domains, their application to automated physiological report generation for music therapy represents an unexplored task. We present a prototype system that leverages LLMs to bridge this gap -- transforming raw EEG and cardiovascular data into human-readable therapeutic reports and personalized music recommendations. Unlike prior work focusing on real-time physiological adaptation during listening, our approach emphasizes post-session analysis and interpretable reporting, enabling non-expert users to comprehend their psychophysiological states and track therapeutic outcomes over time. By integrating signal processing modules with LLM-based reasoning agents, the system provides a practical and low-cost solution for short-term progress monitoring in home music therapy contexts. This work demonstrates the feasibility of applying LLMs to a novel task -- democratizing access to physiology-driven music therapy through automated, interpretable reporting.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2601.12280,
title = {Democratizing Music Therapy: LLM-Based Automated EEG Analysis and Progress Tracking for Low-Cost Home Devices},
author = {Huixin Xue and Guangjun Xu and Shihong Ren and Xian Gao and Ruian Tie and Zhen Zhou and Hao Liu and Yue Gao},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.12280},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
Withdrawn by the authors due to issues in the experimental validation and interpretation of EEG-derived measures, which may affect the reliability of the reported results and conclusions. The current version should not be cited as a reliable reference