Deformation and Unobstructedness of Determinantal Schemes
Abstract
Let be the Hilbert scheme of closed subschemes of with Hilbert polynomial , and let be the closure of the locus in of determinantal schemes defined by the vanishing of the minors of some matrix of size with -enty a homogeneous form of degree and with satisfying . is an irreducible algebraic set. First of all, we compute an upper -independent bound for the dimension of in terms of and which is sharp for . In the linear case () and cases sufficiently close, we conjecture and to a certain degree prove that this bound is achieved for all . Then, we study to what extent is a generically smooth component of . Under some weak numerical assumptions on the integers and (or under some depth conditions) we conjecture and often prove that is a generically smooth component. Moreover, we also study the depth of the normal module of the homogeneous coordinate ring of and of a closely related module. We conjecture, and in some cases prove, that their codepth is often 1 (resp. ). These results extend previous results on standard determinantal schemes to determinantal schemes; i.e. previous results of the authors on to with and . Finally, deformations of exterior powers of the cokernel of the map determined by are studied and proven to be given as deformations of if . The work contains many examples which illustrate the results obtained and a considerable number of open problems; some of them are collected as conjectures in the final section.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2007.12119,
title = {Deformation and Unobstructedness of Determinantal Schemes},
author = {Jan O. Kleppe and Rosa M. Miró-Roig},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.12119},
year = {2023}
}
Comments
This version (v2) is a postprint (AAM) of an article published in the Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, with very minor changes from version v1. The final authenticated version is available online at DOI: 10.1090/memo/1418. Remark 3.2 is, however, extended and the new extension in (3) and (4) is not included in the published paper. Remark 3.2(4) makes a correction to [33]