Deep learning for regression tasks on medical imaging data has shown promising results. However, compared to other approaches, their power is strongly linked to the dataset size. In this study, we evaluate 3D-convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and classical regression methods with hand-crafted features for survival time regression of patients with high grade brain tumors. The tested CNNs for regression showed promising but unstable results. The best performing deep learning approach reached an accuracy of 51.5% on held-out samples of the training set. All tested deep learning experiments were outperformed by a Support Vector Classifier (SVC) using 30 radiomic features. The investigated features included intensity, shape, location and deep features. The submitted method to the BraTS 2018 survival prediction challenge is an ensemble of SVCs, which reached a cross-validated accuracy of 72.2% on the BraTS 2018 training set, 57.1% on the validation set, and 42.9% on the testing set. The results suggest that more training data is necessary for a stable performance of a CNN model for direct regression from magnetic resonance images, and that non-imaging clinical patient information is crucial along with imaging information.
@article{arxiv.1811.04907,
title = {Deep Learning versus Classical Regression for Brain Tumor Patient Survival Prediction},
author = {Yannick Suter and Alain Jungo and Michael Rebsamen and Urspeter Knecht and Evelyn Herrmann and Roland Wiest and Mauricio Reyes},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04907},
year = {2018}
}
Comments
Contribution to The International Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2018, survival prediction task