English

Deconstructing Superintelligence: Identity, Self-Modification and Diff\'erance

Artificial Intelligence 2026-04-28 v3

Abstract

Self-modification is often taken as constitutive of artificial superintelligence (SI), yet modification is a relative action requiring a supplement outside the operation. When self-modification extends to this supplement, the classical self-referential structure collapses. We formalise this on an associative operator algebra A\mathcal{A} with update U^\hat{U}, discrimination D^\hat{D}, and self-representation R^\hat{R}, identifying the supplement with Comm(U^)\mathrm{Comm}(\hat{U}); an expansion theorem shows that [U^,R^][\hat{U},\hat{R}] decomposes through [U^,D^][\hat{U},\hat{D}], so non-commutation generically propagates. The liar paradox appears as a commutator collapse [T^,ΠL]=0[\hat{T},\Pi_L]=0, and class A\mathbf{A} self-modification realises the same collapse at system scale, yielding a structure coinciding with Priest's inclosure schema and Derrida's diff\`erance.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2604.19845,
  title  = {Deconstructing Superintelligence: Identity, Self-Modification and Diff\'erance},
  author = {Elija Perrier},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.19845},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Under review

R2 v1 2026-07-01T12:29:05.947Z