English

Decaying Dark Matter: Simulations and Weak-Lensing Forecast

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2021-10-20 v2

Abstract

Despite evidence for the existence of dark matter (DM) from very high and low redshifts, a moderate amount of DM particle decay remains a valid possibility. This includes both models with very long-lived yet unstable particles or mixed scenarios where only a small fraction of dark matter is allowed to decay. In this paper, we investigate how DM particles decaying into radiation affect non-linear structure formation. We look at the power spectrum and its redshift evolution, varying both the decay lifetime (τ\tau) and the fraction of decaying-to-total dark matter (ff), and we propose a fitting function that reaches sub-percent precision below k10k\sim10 h/Mpc. Based on this fit, we perform a forecast analysis for a Euclid-like weak lensing (WL) survey, including both massive neutrino and baryonic feedback parameters. We find that with WL observations alone, it is possible to rule out decay lifetimes smaller than τ=75\tau=75 Gyr (at 95 percent CL) for the case that all DM is unstable. This constraint improves to τ=182\tau=182 Gyr if the WL data is combined with CMB priors from the Planck satellite and to τ=275\tau=275 Gyr if we further assume baryonic feedback to be fully constrained by upcoming Sunyaev-Zeldovich or X-ray data. The latter shows a factor of 3.2 improvement compared to constraints from CMB data alone. Regarding the scenario of a strongly decaying sub-component of dark matter with τ30\tau\sim 30 Gyr or lower, it will be possible to rule out a decaying-to-total fraction of f>0.49f>0.49, f>0.21f>0.21, and f>0.13f>0.13 (at the 95 percent CL) for the same three scenarios. We conclude that the upcoming stage-IV WL surveys will allow us to significantly improve current constraints on the stability of the dark matter sector.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2104.07675,
  title  = {Decaying Dark Matter: Simulations and Weak-Lensing Forecast},
  author = {Jonathan Hubert and Aurel Schneider and Doug Potter and Joachim Stadel and Sambit K. Giri},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07675},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

matching accepted version

R2 v1 2026-06-24T01:12:55.247Z