We introduce Debate2Create (D2C), a multi-agent LLM framework that formulates robot co-design as structured, iterative debate grounded in physics-based evaluation. A design agent and control agent engage in a thesis-antithesis-synthesis loop, while pluralistic LLM judges provide multi-objective feedback to steer exploration. Across five MuJoCo locomotion benchmarks, D2C achieves up to 3.2× the default Ant score and ∼9× on Swimmer, outperforming prior LLM-based methods and black-box optimization. Iterative debate yields 18--35% gains over compute-matched zero-shot generation, and D2C-generated rewards transfer to default morphologies in 4/5 tasks. Our results demonstrate that structured multi-agent debate offers an effective alternative to hand-designed objectives for joint morphology-reward optimization.
@article{arxiv.2510.25850,
title = {Debate2Create: Robot Co-design via Multi-Agent LLM Debate},
author = {Kevin Qiu and Marek Cygan},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.25850},
year = {2026}
}