English

Critical dynamical behavior of the Ising model

Statistical Mechanics 2023-09-22 v2

Abstract

We investigate the dynamical critical behavior of the two- and three-dimensional Ising model with Glauber dynamics in equilibrium. In contrast to the usual standing, we focus on the mean-squared deviation of the magnetization MM, MSDM_M, as a function of time, as well as on the autocorrelation function of MM. These two functions are distinct but closely related. We find that MSDM_M features a first crossover at time τ1Lz1\tau_1 \sim L^{z_{1}}, from ordinary diffusion with MSDM_M t\sim t, to anomalous diffusion with MSDM_M tα\sim t^\alpha. Purely on numerical grounds, we obtain the values z1=0.45(5)z_1=0.45(5) and α=0.752(5)\alpha=0.752(5) for the two-dimensional Ising ferromagnet. Related to this, the magnetization autocorrelation function crosses over from an exponential decay to a stretched-exponential decay. At later times, we find a second crossover at time τ2Lz2\tau_2 \sim L^{z_{2}}. Here, MSDM_M saturates to its late-time value L2+γ/ν\sim L^{2+\gamma/\nu}, while the autocorrelation function crosses over from stretched-exponential decay to simple exponential one. We also confirm numerically the value z2=2.1665(12)z_{2}=2.1665(12), earlier reported as the single dynamic exponent. Continuity of MSDM_M requires that α(z2z1)=γ/νz1\alpha(z_{2}-z_{1})=\gamma/\nu-z_1. We speculate that z1=1/2z_{1} = 1/2 and α=3/4\alpha = 3/4, values that indeed lead to the expected z2=13/6z_{2} = 13/6 result. A complementary analysis for the three-dimensional Ising model provides the estimates z1=1.35(2)z_{1} = 1.35(2), α=0.90(2)\alpha=0.90(2), and z2=2.032(3)z_{2} = 2.032(3). While z2z_{2} has attracted significant attention in the literature, we argue that for all practical purposes z1z_{1} is more important, as it determines the number of statistically independent measurements during a long simulation.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2307.01837,
  title  = {Critical dynamical behavior of the Ising model},
  author = {Zihua Liu and Erol Vatansever and Gerard T. Barkema and Nikolaos G. Fytas},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01837},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

6 pages, 6 figures, version published in Physical Review E

R2 v1 2026-06-28T11:22:05.118Z