Evaluating long-context radiology report generation is challenging. NLG metrics fail to capture clinical correctness, while LLM-based metrics often lack generalizability. Clinical accuracy metrics are more relevant but are sensitive to class imbalance, frequently favoring trivial predictions. We propose the CRG Score, a distribution-aware and adaptable metric that evaluates only clinically relevant abnormalities explicitly described in reference reports. CRG supports both binary and structured labels (e.g., type, location) and can be paired with any LLM for feature extraction. By balancing penalties based on label distribution, it enables fairer, more robust evaluation and serves as a clinically aligned reward function.
@article{arxiv.2505.17167,
title = {CRG Score: A Distribution-Aware Clinical Metric for Radiology Report Generation},
author = {Ibrahim Ethem Hamamci and Sezgin Er and Suprosanna Shit and Hadrien Reynaud and Bernhard Kainz and Bjoern Menze},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17167},
year = {2025}
}