Counting Induced Subgraphs: A Topological Approach to #W[1]-hardness

We investigate the problem $\#\mathsf{IndSub}(\Phi)$ of counting all induced subgraphs of size $k$ in a graph $G$ that satisfy a given property $\Phi$. This continues the work of Jerrum and Meeks who proved the problem to be $\#\mathrm{W[1]}$-hard for some families of properties which include, among others, (dis)connectedness [JCSS 15] and even- or oddness of the number of edges [Combinatorica 17]. Using the recent framework of graph motif parameters due to Curticapean, Dell and Marx [STOC 17], we discover that for monotone properties $\Phi$, the problem $\#\mathsf{IndSub}(\Phi)$ is hard for $\#\mathrm{W[1]}$ if the reduced Euler characteristic of the associated simplicial (graph) complex of $\Phi$ is non-zero. This observation links $\#\mathsf{IndSub}(\Phi)$ to Karp's famous Evasiveness Conjecture, as every graph complex with non-vanishing reduced Euler characteristic is known to be evasive. Applying tools from the "topological approach to evasiveness" which was introduced in the seminal paper of Khan, Saks and Sturtevant [FOCS 83], we prove that $\#\mathsf{IndSub}(\Phi)$ is $\#\mathrm{W[1]}$-hard for every monotone property $\Phi$ that does not hold on the Hamilton cycle as well as for some monotone properties that hold on the Hamilton cycle such as being triangle-free or not $k$-edge-connected for $k > 2$. Moreover, we show that for those properties $\#\mathsf{IndSub}(\Phi)$ can not be solved in time $f(k)\cdot n^{o(k)}$ for any computable function $f$ unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. In the final part of the paper, we investigate non-monotone properties and prove that $\#\mathsf{IndSub}(\Phi)$ is $\#\mathrm{W[1]}$-hard if $\Phi$ is any non-trivial modularity constraint on the number of edges with respect to some prime $q$ or if $\Phi$ enforces the presence of a fixed isolated subgraph.