English

Counterexamples to the Minimum Period Conjecture for Restricted Partition Functions

Combinatorics 2026-08-03 v1 Number Theory

Abstract

For a finite sequence of positive integers a=(a1,,an)\boldsymbol{a}=(a_1,\dots,a_n), the restricted partition function qa(k)q_{\boldsymbol{a}}(k) denote the number of nonnegative integer solutions to the equation a1x1+a2x2++anxn=ka_1x_1+a_2x_2+\cdots +a_nx_n=k. It is proved to be a quasi-polynomial of degree n1n-1. Write qa(k)=j=0n1cj(k)kjq_{\boldsymbol{a}}(k)=\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}c_j(k)k^j with periodic coefficient functions cjc_j, and set bm=#{i:mai}b_m=\#\{i:m\mid a_i\}. In 2008, Beck, Sam, and Woods conjectured that the minimum period of cj(k)c_j(k) is lcm{m:bm>j}\mathrm{lcm}\{m:b_m>j\}. In this paper, we derive an exact root-of-unity formula for every coefficient function cj(k)c_j(k). The formula proves the conjectured divisibility upper bound, but it also reveals a lower bound for the period of cj(k)c_j(k). Both divisibility bounds are sharp. This leads us to construct a family of counterexamples to this conjecture.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2608.02085,
  title  = {Counterexamples to the Minimum Period Conjecture for Restricted Partition Functions},
  author = {Feihu Liu and Jinlong Tang and Guoce Xin and Chen Zhang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.02085},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

19 pages