English

Cosmological test of an extended quintessence model

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2021-05-26 v4 General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Abstract

We investigate the cosmological observational test of the extended quintessence model, i.e. a scalar-tensor gravity model with a scalar field potential serving as dark energy, by using the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, together with the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and redshift-space distortion (RSD) data. As an example, we consider the model with a Brans-Dicke kinetic term ω(ϕ)ϕϕ;μϕ;μ\frac{\omega(\phi)}{\phi} \phi_{;\mu} \phi^{;\mu} and a quadratic scalar potential V(ϕ)=A+B(ϕϕ0)+C2(ϕϕ0)2V (\phi) = A + B (\phi - \phi_0) + \frac{C}{2} (\phi - \phi_0)^2, which reduces to general relativity (GR) in the limit ω(ϕ)\omega(\phi) \to \infty, and the cosmological constant in the limit B=C=0B=C=0. In such a model the scalar field typically rolls down the potential and oscillates around the minimum of V(ϕ)V (\phi). We find that the model parameter estimate for the CMB+BAO+RSD data set is given by lgα=3.60.54+0.66 (68%)\lg \alpha = -3.6 _{-0.54}^{+0.66}~ (68\%), corresponding to 3.8×105<ω0<9.5×107 (68%) 3.8 \times 10^5 < \omega_0 < 9.5 \times 10^7~ (68\%), and lgC=4.9±1.4 (68%)\lg C = 4.9 \pm 1.4~ (68\%) . However, the GR Λ\LambdaCDM model can fit the data almost as good as this extended quintessence model, and is favored by the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The variation of the gravitational constant since the epoch of Recombination is constrained to be 0.97<Grec/G0<1.03 (1σ)0.97 < G_{\rm rec}/G_0 < 1.03~ (1 \sigma). In light of recent report that the CMB data favors a closed universe, we consider the case with non-flat geometry in our fit, and find that the mean value of Ωk\Omega_k shifts a little bit from 0.049-0.049 to 0.036-0.036, and the parameters in our model are not degenerate with Ωk\Omega_k.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2101.11875,
  title  = {Cosmological test of an extended quintessence model},
  author = {Gong Cheng and Fengquan Wu and Xuelei Chen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11875},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

11 pages, 5 figures, minor revision, conclusion unchanged