Cosmological Measures without Volume Weighting
Abstract
Many cosmologists (myself included) have advocated volume weighting for the cosmological measure problem, weighting spatial hypersurfaces by their volume. However, this often leads to the Boltzmann brain problem, that almost all observations would be by momentary Boltzmann brains that arise very briefly as quantum fluctuations in the late universe when it has expanded to a huge size, so that our observations (too ordered for Boltzmann brains) would be highly atypical and unlikely. Here it is suggested that volume weighting may be a mistake. Volume averaging is advocated as an alternative. One consequence may be a loss of the argument that eternal inflation gives a nonzero probability that our universe now has infinite volume.
Cite
@article{arxiv.0808.0351,
title = {Cosmological Measures without Volume Weighting},
author = {Don N. Page},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0808.0351},
year = {2009}
}
Comments
15 pages, LaTeX, added references for constant-H hypersurfaces and also an idea for minimal-flux hypersurfaces