English

Correspondence between isoscalar monopole strengths and $\alpha$ inelastic cross sections on $^{24}$Mg

Nuclear Theory 2021-08-24 v2

Abstract

The correspondence between the isoscalar monopole (IS0) transition strengths and α\alpha inelastic cross sections, the B(IS0)B({\rm IS0})-(α,α)(\alpha,\alpha') correspondence, is investigated for 24^{24}Mg(α,α\alpha,\alpha') at 130 and 386 MeV. We adopt a microscopic coupled-channel reaction framework to link structural inputs, diagonal and transition densities, for 24^{24}Mg obtained with antisymmetrized molecular dynamics to the (α,α\alpha,\alpha') cross sections. We aim at clarifying how the B(IS0)B({\rm IS0})-(α,α)(\alpha,\alpha') correspondence is affected by the nuclear distortion, the in-medium modification to the nucleon-nucleon effective interaction in the scattering process, and the coupled-channels effect. It is found that these effects are significant and the explanation of the B(IS0)B({\rm IS0})-(α,α)(\alpha,\alpha') correspondence in the plane wave limit with the long-wavelength approximation, which is often used, makes no sense. Nevertheless, the B(IS0)B({\rm IS0})-(α,α)(\alpha,\alpha') correspondence tends to remain because of a strong constraint on the transition densities between the ground state and the 0+0^+ excited states. The correspondence is found to hold at 386 MeV with an error of about 20%-30%, while it is seriously stained at 130 MeV mainly by the strong nuclear distortion. It is also found that when a 0+0^+ state that has a different structure from a simple α\alpha cluster state is considered, the B(IS0)B({\rm IS0})-(α,α)(\alpha,\alpha') correspondence becomes less valid. For a quantitative discussion on the α\alpha clustering in 0+0^+ excited states of nuclei, a microscopic description of both the structure and reaction parts will be necessary.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2001.09627,
  title  = {Correspondence between isoscalar monopole strengths and $\alpha$ inelastic cross sections on $^{24}$Mg},
  author = {Kazuyuki Ogata and Yohei Chiba and Yukinori Sakuragi},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.09627},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

7 figures, 4 tables