English

Conversational Feedback in Scripted versus Spontaneous Dialogues: A Comparative Analysis

Computation and Language 2024-10-04 v2

Abstract

Scripted dialogues such as movie and TV subtitles constitute a widespread source of training data for conversational NLP models. However, there are notable linguistic differences between these dialogues and spontaneous interactions, especially regarding the occurrence of communicative feedback such as backchannels, acknowledgments, or clarification requests. This paper presents a quantitative analysis of such feedback phenomena in both subtitles and spontaneous conversations. Based on conversational data spanning eight languages and multiple genres, we extract lexical statistics, classifications from a dialogue act tagger, expert annotations and labels derived from a fine-tuned Large Language Model (LLM). Our main empirical findings are that (1) communicative feedback is markedly less frequent in subtitles than in spontaneous dialogues and (2) subtitles contain a higher proportion of negative feedback. We also show that dialogues generated by standard LLMs lie much closer to scripted dialogues than spontaneous interactions in terms of communicative feedback.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2309.15656,
  title  = {Conversational Feedback in Scripted versus Spontaneous Dialogues: A Comparative Analysis},
  author = {Ildikó Pilán and Laurent Prévot and Hendrik Buschmeier and Pierre Lison},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15656},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

Updated version for SIGdial 2024

R2 v1 2026-06-28T12:33:44.901Z