English

Conventional and Unitarity-Conserving Peccei-Quinn Inflation Models and ACT

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2026-05-05 v3 Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Abstract

We compare conventional non-minimally coupled Peccei-Quinn (PQ) inflation with a version of the model in which unitarity conservation is imposed by additional Jordan frame interactions. Assuming instantaneous reheating, the unitarity-conserving model is within 1σ\sigma agreement with the central value of the scalar spectral index reported by the ACT collaboration, whereas conventional PQ inflation is more than 2σ\sigma below the ACT central value. In the case where dark matter is composed of axions and PQ symmetry is not restored after inflation, the axion isocurvature constraint of the unitarity-conserving model typically allows a much larger axion decay constant faf_{a} than the conventional model, with the conventional model upper bound being comparable only if the PQ scalar self-coupling is extremely small, λ1010\lambda \lesssim 10^{-10}. For λ=0.1\lambda = 0.1, the axion isocurvature upper bounds are fa1.1×109f_{a} \lesssim 1.1 \times 10^{9} GeV for conventional PQ inflation and fa6.4×1013f_{a} \lesssim 6.4 \times 10^{13} GeV for unitarity-conserving PQ inflation, with the latter bound being independent of λ\lambda. We also find a new isocurvature upper bound for conventional PQ inflation which is 650 times smaller than the existing bound. A modest reduction of the reheating temperature of the unitarity-conserving model from its maximum possible value will ensure that the PQ symmetry is not restored after inflation, allowing values of faf_{a} up to 6.4×10136.4 \times 10^{13} GeV. Thus only the unitarity-conserving PQ inflation model allows faf_{a} to access values greater than the symmetry restoration cosmological upper bound 1012\sim 10^{12} GeV with naturally large values of the PQ scalar self-coupling.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2603.29780,
  title  = {Conventional and Unitarity-Conserving Peccei-Quinn Inflation Models and ACT},
  author = {J. McDonald},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.29780},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

15 pages, 4 figures. Improved Figure 4, some typos corrected