English

Continual Learning in Transition

Machine Learning 2026-08-06 v1 Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Classical continual learning (CL) has primarily focused on enabling models to update and retain knowledge through parameter-centric mechanisms, e.g., training strategies, architectural designs, and weight adaptation. However, emerging paradigms are reshaping the scope of CL beyond this traditional model adaptation view. For instance, on-policy learning broadens the space of update mechanisms; test-time training extends CL from the training phase to inference; and external harness components such as memory, skill libraries, and interaction protocols extend the evolutionary boundaries of model capabilities far beyond the static parameter space. Collectively, these developments indicate a transition from parameter-centric learning toward system-level adaptation. To characterize this transition, we examine the evolution of continual learning through three dimensions: When, How, and Where learning occurs. The How dimension encompasses off-policy, on-policy, and beyond-gradient optimization mechanics. The When dimension captures evolution across pre-training, post-training, and inference-time stages. The Where dimension delineates updates occurring within internal parameters versus external structural constraints. Anchored by this tri-axial framework, we systematically survey representative methods, trace the ongoing transition of continual learning, and discuss the key challenges, broader implications, and future directions arising from this paradigm shift.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2608.06216,
  title  = {Continual Learning in Transition},
  author = {Zhiyan Hou and Dan Zhang and Tao Feng and Liyuan Wang and Wei Li and Xiangzhao Hao and Hongyan An and Junfeng Fang and Haokai Ma and Zhaohui Xu and Haiyun Guo and Jinqiao Wang and Tat-Seng Chua},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.06216},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

23 pages, 6 figures, 1 table. Survey on continual learning in the LLM and agentic-AI era