Contextuality from Single-State Ontological Models: An Information-Theoretic Obstruction
Abstract
Contextuality is a central feature of quantum theory, traditionally understood as the impossibility of reproducing quantum measurement statistics using noncontextual ontological models. We study classical ontological descriptions in which a fixed subsystem-level ontic state space is reused across multiple interventions. Our main result is an information-theoretic obstruction: whenever a classical single-state model reproduces operational statistics using an auxiliary contextual register, the required contextual information is lower-bounded by the conditional mutual information between intervention and outcome conditioned on the subsystem ontic state . The mathematical inequality itself is elementary, but its interpretive significance is structural: under shared-state reuse, contextual distinctions need not be fully internalized within the subsystem ontic state alone. We provide a constructive illustration of this point and clarify how the issue should be understood as a limitation of subsystem-level classical representation, rather than as a dualism about physical reality. We further discuss how this perspective relates to ontological models and to contextuality in quantum foundations.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2602.16716,
title = {Contextuality from Single-State Ontological Models: An Information-Theoretic Obstruction},
author = {Song-Ju Kim},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.16716},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
Version 3: The main result was reframed as an information-theoretic obstruction rather than a no-go theorem. We clarified that ontic states are subsystem-level and reformulated interventions operationally to avoid dualism. The main claim was weakened to a proposition, restricting strict positivity to contextual regimes, with corresponding revisions to the abstract, intro, and appendix