English

Constraints on the fluctuation amplitude and density parameter from X-ray cluster number counts

Astrophysics 2009-10-30 v3

Abstract

We find that the observed log N - log S relation of X-ray clusters can be reproduced remarkably well with a certain range of values for the fluctuation amplitude σ8\sigma_8 and the cosmological density parameter Ω0\Omega_0 in cold dark matter (CDM) universes. The 1σ1\sigma confidence limits on σ8\sigma_8 in the CDM models with n=1n=1 and h=0.7h = 0.7 are expressed as (0.54±0.02)Ω00.350.82Ω0+0.55Ω02(0.54 \pm 0.02) \Omega_0^{-0.35-0.82\Omega_0+0.55\Omega_0^2} (λ0=1Ω0\lambda_0=1-\Omega_0) and (0.54±0.02)Ω00.280.91Ω0+0.68Ω02(0.54 \pm 0.02) \Omega_0^{-0.28-0.91\Omega_0+0.68\Omega_0^2} (λ0=0\lambda_0=0), where nn is the primordial spectral index, and hh and λ0\lambda_0 are the dimensionless Hubble and cosmological constants. The errors quoted above indicate the statistical ones from the observed log N - log S only, and the systematic uncertainty from our theoretical modelling of X-ray flux in the best-fit value of σ8\sigma_8 is about 15%. In the case of n=1n=1, we find that the CDM models with (Ω0,λ0,h,σ8)(0.3,0.7,0.7,1)(\Omega_0,\lambda_0,h,\sigma_8) \simeq (0.3,0.7,0.7,1) and (0.45,0,0.7,0.8)(0.45, 0, 0.7, 0.8) simultaneously account for the cluster log N - logSS, X-ray temperature functions, and the normalization from the COBE 4 year data. The derived values assume the observations are without systematic errors, and we discuss in details other theoretical uncertainties which may change the limits on Ω0\Omega_0 and σ8\sigma_8 from the log N - log S relation. We have shown the power of this new approach which will become a strong tool as the observations attain more precision.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.astro-ph/9702017,
  title  = {Constraints on the fluctuation amplitude and density parameter from X-ray cluster number counts},
  author = {Tetsu Kitayama and Yasushi Suto},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/9702017},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

15 pages. Substantial revision. Accepted for publication in Astrophysical Journal, Part 1

R2 v1 2026-07-22T09:32:18.386Z