English

Constraining nuclear matter parameters with GW170817

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology 2021-01-19 v6 High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

Abstract

The tidal measurement of gravitational waves from the binary neutron star merger event GW170817 allows us to probe nuclear physics that suffers less from astrophysical systematics compared to neutron star radius measurements with electromagnetic wave observations. A recent work found strong correlation among neutron-star tidal deformabilities and certain combinations of nuclear parameters associated with the equation of state. These relations were then used to derive bounds on such parameters from GW170817 assuming that the relations and neutron star masses are known exactly. Here, we expand on this important work by taking into account a few new considerations: (1) a broader class of equations of state; (2) correlations with the mass-weighted tidal deformability that was directly measured with GW170817; (3) how the relations depend on the binary mass ratio; (4) the uncertainty from equation of state variation in the correlation relations; (5) adopting the updated tidal deformability measurement from GW170817. Upon these new considerations, we find GW170817 bounds on nuclear parameters (the incompressibility K0K_0, its slope M0M_0 and the curvature of symmetry energy Ksym,0K_{\mathrm{sym},0} at nuclear saturation density) to be 81 MeV K0\leq K_0 \leq 362 MeV, 1556 MeV M0\leq M_0 \leq 4971 MeV, and -254 MeV Ksym,0\leq K_\mathrm{sym,0} \leq 27 MeV, which are more conservative than previously found with systematic errors more properly taken into account.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1812.08910,
  title  = {Constraining nuclear matter parameters with GW170817},
  author = {Zack Carson and Andrew W. Steiner and Kent Yagi},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08910},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

15 pages, 14 figures; Updated the section on computing the EoS scattering uncertainty to include a more comprehensive error analysis; Fixed issue with incorrect EoSs plotted in Fig. 3; Fixed a small mistake on nuclear matter bounds; Used conditional probability distributions rather than 2D ones to compute nuclear parameter bounds

R2 v1 2026-06-23T06:52:06.922Z