Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: The case of two SNIP versions
Abstract
A framework is proposed for comparing different types of bibliometric indicators, introducing the notion of an Indicator Comparison Report. It provides a comprehensive overview of the main differences and similarities of indicators. The comparison shows both the strong points and the limitations of each of the indicators at stake, rather than over-promoting one indicator and ignoring the benefits of alternative constructs. It focuses on base notions, assumptions, and application contexts, which makes it more intelligible to non-experts. As an illustration, a comparison report is presented for the original and the modified SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper) indicator of journal citation impact.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1510.05128,
title = {Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: The case of two SNIP versions},
author = {Henk F. Moed},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.05128},
year = {2015}
}
Comments
Author copy of an article accepted for publication in Scientometrics, posted on 17 Oct 2015