Complexity scaling and optimal policy degeneracy in quantum reinforcement learning via analytically solvable unitary-control-then-measure models

We propose and analyse a class of analytically solvable models of quantum reinforcement learning (QRL), formulated as finite-horizon Markov decision processes in finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. The models are built around a `unitary-control-then-measure' protocol, in which a learning agent applies unitary transformations to a quantum state and interleaves each control step with a projective measurement onto a prescribed reference basis. Exact closed-form expressions for trajectory probabilities, rewards, and the expected return are derived for four concrete realisations: a closed-chain and an anti-periodic qubit implementation, a qutrit model with ladder coupling, and a four-level two-qubit system. Two structural features of these QRL protocols are rigorously analysed. First, we identify and quantify a two-level reduction in the computational complexity of the expected return, from the nominally exponential $O(e^N)$ scaling in the trajectory length~$N$ to an explicit power-law $O(N^{\mathcal{I}})$: a trajectory-based level, arising from equivalence classes of paths sharing the same unordered state counts and transition frequencies, and a policy-based level, arising from the sparsity of the transition graph enforced by constrained unitary actions. Second, we characterise the degeneracy of optimal policies. The low-dimensional models exhibit unique optima whose asymptotic behaviour with~$N$ is governed by the quantum Zeno effect, while the four-level system displays both plateau-type quasi-degeneracy at large horizons and genuine discrete degeneracy at critical energy parameters -- phenomena with no counterpart in the measurement-free quantum optimal control landscape.