Competing structures in two dimensions: square-to-hexagonal transition
Abstract
We study a system of particles in two dimensions interacting via a dipolar long-range potential and subject to a square-lattice substrate potential with amplitude and lattice constant . The isotropic interaction favors a hexagonal arrangement of the particles with lattice constant , which competes against the square symmetry of the substrate lattice. We determine the minimal-energy states at fixed external pressure generating the commensurate density in the absence of thermal and quantum fluctuations, using both analytical and numerical techniques. At large substrate amplitude , with the dipolar energy scale, the particles reside in the substrate minima and hence arrange in a square lattice. Upon decreasing , the square lattice turns unstable with respect to a zone-boundary shear-mode and deforms into a period-doubled zig-zag lattice. Analytic and numerical results show that this period-doubled phase in turn becomes unstable at towards a non-uniform phase developing an array of domain walls or solitons; as the density of solitons increases, the particle arrangement approaches that of a rhombic (or isosceles triangular) lattice. At a yet smaller substrate value estimated as , a further solitonic transition establishes a second non-uniform phase which smoothly approaches the hexagonal (or equilateral triangular) lattice phase with vanishing amplitude . At small but finite amplitude , the hexagonal phase is distorted and hexatically locked at an angle of with respect to the substrate lattice. The square-to-hexagonal transformation in this two-dimensional commensurate-incommensurate system thus involves a complex pathway with various non-trivial lattice- and modulated phases.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1605.08262,
title = {Competing structures in two dimensions: square-to-hexagonal transition},
author = {Barbara Gränz and Sergey E. Koshunov and Vadim B. Geshkenbein and Gianni Blatter},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.08262},
year = {2016}
}
Comments
30 pages, 25 figures