English

Comparison of Theoretical Starburst Photoionisation Models for Optical Diagnostics

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2019-06-10 v3

Abstract

We study and compare different examples of stellar evolutionary synthesis input parameters used to produce photoionisation model grids using the MAPPINGS V modelling code. The aim of this study is to (a) explore the systematic effects of various stellar evolutionary synthesis model parameters on the interpretation of emission lines in optical strong-line diagnostic diagrams, (b) characterise the combination of parameters able to reproduce the spread of local galaxies located in the star-forming region in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, and (c) investigate the emission from extremely metal-poor galaxies using photoionisation models. We explore and compare the stellar input ionising spectrum (stellar population synthesis code [Starburst99, SLUG, BPASS], stellar evolutionary tracks, stellar atmospheres, star-formation history, sampling of the initial mass function) as well as parameters intrinsic to the H II region (metallicity, ionisation parameter, pressure, H II region boundedness). We also perform a comparison of the photoionisation codes MAPPINGS and CLOUDY. On the variations in the ionising spectrum model parameters, we find that the differences in strong emission-line ratios between varying models for a given input model parameter are small, on average ~0.1 dex. An average difference of ~0.1 dex in emission-line ratio is also found between models produced with MAPPINGS and CLOUDY. Large differences between the emission-line ratios are found when comparing intrinsic H II region parameters. We find that low-metallicity galaxies are better explained by a density-bounded H II region and higher pressures better encompass the spread of galaxies at high redshift.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1905.09528,
  title  = {Comparison of Theoretical Starburst Photoionisation Models for Optical Diagnostics},
  author = {Joshua J. D'Agostino and Lisa J. Kewley and Brent Groves and Nell Byler and Ralph S. Sutherland and David Nicholls and Claus Leitherer and Elizabeth R. Stanway},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.09528},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

33 pages, 26 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ