English

Comparison of RFI Mitigation Strategies for Dispersed Pulse Detection

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics 2015-06-03 v1

Abstract

Impulsive radio-frequency signals from astronomical sources are dispersed by the frequency dependent index of refraction of the interstellar media and so appear as chirped signals when they reach earth. Searches for dispersed impulses have been limited by false detections due to radio frequency interference (RFI) and, in some cases, artifacts of the instrumentation. Many authors have discussed techniques to excise or mitigate RFI in searches for fast transients, but comparisons between different approaches are lacking. This work develops RFI mitigation techniques for use in searches for dispersed pulses, employing data recorded in a "Fly's Eye" mode of the Allen Telescope Array as a test case. We gauge the performance of several RFI mitigation techniques by adding dispersed signals to data containing RFI and comparing false alarm rates at the observed signal-to-noise ratios of the added signals. We find that Huber filtering is most effective at removing broadband interferers, while frequency centering is most effective at removing narrow frequency interferers. Neither of these methods is effective over a broad range of interferers. A method that combines Huber filtering and adaptive interference cancellation provides the lowest number of false positives over the interferers considered here. The methods developed here have application to other searches for dispersed pulses in incoherent spectra, especially those involving multiple beam systems.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1201.1525,
  title  = {Comparison of RFI Mitigation Strategies for Dispersed Pulse Detection},
  author = {John Hogden and Scott Vander Wiel and Geoffrey C. Bower and Sarah Michalak and Andrew Siemion and Daniel Werthimer},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.1525},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in ApJ