English

Comparison of planetary H\alpha-emission models: A new correlation with accretion luminosity

Earth and Planetary Astrophysics 2021-08-24 v1 Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Abstract

Accreting planets have been detected through their hydrogen-line emission, specifically Hα\alpha. To interpret this, stellar-regime empirical correlations between the Hα\alpha luminosity LHαL_\mathrm{H\alpha} and the accretion luminosity LaccL_\mathrm{acc} or accretion rate M˙\dot{M} have been extrapolated to planetary masses, however without validation. We present a theoretical LaccL_\mathrm{acc}--LHαL_\mathrm{H\alpha} relationship applicable to a shock at the surface of a planet. We consider wide ranges of accretion rates and masses and use detailed spectrally-resolved, non-equilibrium models of the postshock cooling. The new relationship gives a markedly higher LaccL_\mathrm{acc} for a given LHαL_\mathrm{H\alpha} than fits to young stellar objects, because Ly-α\alpha, which is not observable, carries a large fraction of LaccL_\mathrm{acc}. Specifically, an LHαL_\mathrm{H\alpha} measurement needs ten to 100 times higher LaccL_\mathrm{acc} and M˙\dot{M} than previously predicted, which may explain the rarity of planetary Hα\alpha detections. We also compare the M˙\dot{M}--LHαL_\mathrm{H\alpha} relationships coming from the planet-surface shock or implied by accretion-funnel emission. Both can contribute simultaneously to an observed Hα\alpha signal but at low (high) M˙\dot{M} the planetary-surface shock (heated funnel) dominates. Only the shock produces Gaussian line wings. Finally, we discuss accretion contexts in which different emission scenarios may apply, putting recent literature models in perspective, and also present LaccL_\mathrm{acc}--LlineL_\mathrm{line} relationships for several other hydrogen lines.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2108.01277,
  title  = {Comparison of planetary H\alpha-emission models: A new correlation with accretion luminosity},
  author = {Yuhiko Aoyama and Gabriel-Dominique Marleau and Masahiro Ikoma and Christoph Mordasini},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01277},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

13 pages, accepted to ApJL