Comparison of an Apocalypse-Free and an Apocalypse-Prone First-Order Low-Rank Optimization Algorithm
Optimization and Control
2022-02-21 v1 Numerical Analysis
Numerical Analysis
Abstract
We compare two first-order low-rank optimization algorithms, namely (Schneider and Uschmajew, 2015), which has been proven to be apocalypse-prone (Levin et al., 2021), and its apocalypse-free version obtained by equipping with a suitable rank reduction mechanism (Olikier et al., 2022). Here an apocalypse refers to the situation where the stationarity measure goes to zero along a convergent sequence whereas it is nonzero at the limit. The comparison is conducted on two simple examples of apocalypses, the original one (Levin et al., 2021) and a new one. We also present a potential side effect of the rank reduction mechanism of and discuss the choice of the rank reduction parameter.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2202.09107,
title = {Comparison of an Apocalypse-Free and an Apocalypse-Prone First-Order Low-Rank Optimization Algorithm},
author = {Guillaume Olikier and Kyle A. Gallivan and P. -A. Absil},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.09107},
year = {2022}
}