English

Comparison between DAMA/LIBRA and COSINE-100 in the light of Quenching Factors

High Energy Physics - Experiment 2019-11-13 v3 Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics High Energy Physics - Phenomenology Instrumentation and Detectors

Abstract

There is a long standing debate about whether or not the annual modulation signal reported by the DAMA/LIBRA collaboration is induced by Weakly Interacting Massive Particles~(WIMP) in the galaxy's dark matter halo scattering from nuclides in their NaI(Tl) crystal target/detector. This is because regions of WIMP-mass vs. WIMP-nucleon cross-section parameter space that can accommodate the DAMA/LIBRA-phase1 modulation signal in the context of the standard WIMP dark matter galactic halo and isospin-conserving~(canonical), spin-independent~(SI) WIMP-nucleon interactions have been excluded by many of other dark matter search experiments including COSINE-100, which uses the same NaI(Tl) target/detector material. Moreover, the recently released DAMA/LIBRA-phase2 results are inconsistent with an interpretation as WIMP-nuclide scattering via the canonical SI interaction and prefer, instead, isospin-violating or spin-dependent interactions. Dark matter interpretations of the DAMA/LIBRA signal are sensitive to the NaI(Tl) scintillation efficiency for nuclear recoils, which is characterized by so-called quenching factors~(QF), and the QF values used in previous studies differ significantly from recently reported measurements, which may have led to incorrect interpretations of the DAMA/LIBRA signal. In this article, the compatibility of the DAMA/LIBRA and COSINE-100 results, in light of the new QF measurements is examined for different possible types of WIMP-nucleon interactions. The resulting allowed parameter space regions associated with the DAMA/LIBRA signal are explicitly compared with 90\% confidence level upper limits from the initial 59.5~day COSINE-100 exposure. With the newly measured QF values, the allowed 3σ\sigma regions from the DAMA/LIBRA data are still generally excluded by the COSINE-100 data.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1907.04963,
  title  = {Comparison between DAMA/LIBRA and COSINE-100 in the light of Quenching Factors},
  author = {Y. J. Ko and K. W. Kim and G. Adhikari and P. Adhikari and E. Barbosa de Souza and N. Carlin and J. J. Choi and S. Choi and M. Djamal and A. C. Ezeribe and C. Ha and I. S. Hahn and E. J. Jeon and J. H. Jo and W. G. Kang and M. Kauer and G. S. Kim and H. Kim and H. J. Kim and N. Y. Kim and S. K. Kim and Y. D. Kim and Y. H. Kim and E. K. Lee and H. S. Lee and J. Lee and J. Y. Lee and M. H. Lee and S. H. Lee and D. S. Leonard and W. A. Lynch and B. B. Manzato and R. H. Maruyama and R. J. Neal and S. L. Olsen and B. J. Park and H. K. Park and H. S. Park and K. S. Park and R. L. C. Pitta and H. Prihtiadi and S. J. Ra and C. Rott and K. A. Shin and A. Scarff and N. J. C. Spooner and W. G. Thompson and L. Yang and G. H. Yu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04963},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

Accepted in JCAP