English

Comparing measures of the Hubble and BAO tensions in $\Lambda$CDM and possible solutions in $f(Q)$ gravity

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2026-03-17 v3 General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract

We test whether f(Q)f(Q) symmetric teleparallel gravity theories can solve the Hubble tension consistently with DESI DR2 BAO. We consider three f(Q)f(Q) functional forms: logarithmic, exponential, and hyperbolic tangent. We extend these models by allowing a cosmological constant, and compare to phenomenological models with a flexible exponential, hyperbolic secant, and polynomial decay addition to the standard Λ\LambdaCDM H(z)H(z). We test these models against DESI DR2 BAO, CMB (PlanckPlanck 2018 + SPT-3G + ACT DR6), local H0H_0, and Cosmic Chronometer data. The logarithmic and hyperbolic tangent f(Q)f(Q) models do not provide an adequate solution, but the exponential model does. Furthermore, it slightly reduces the (Ωm,H0rd)(\Omega_m, H_0 r_d) parameter space tension between CMB and BAO datasets to 2.56σ2.56\sigma, down from 2.65σ2.65\sigma for Λ\LambdaCDM. Although Λ\LambdaCDM faces only 1.66σ1.66\sigma tension in DESI data space, the 1σ1\sigma higher tension in parameter space suggests a real anomaly. The models assisted by the cosmological constant perform slightly better still, at the cost of undermined theoretical motivation. They also perform poorly once local H0H_0 measurements are included. The phenomenological models fit all data reasonably well, yet the best-fitting models predict isotropically averaged BAO distances exceeding the DESI DR2 measurements at all redshifts. This highlights the difficulties of finding a theoretically motivated solution to the Hubble tension while remaining consistent with BAO data.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2510.20964,
  title  = {Comparing measures of the Hubble and BAO tensions in $\Lambda$CDM and possible solutions in $f(Q)$ gravity},
  author = {José Antonio Nájera and Indranil Banik and Harry Desmond and Vasileios Kalaitzidis},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20964},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

32 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables. Published in Galaxies special issue on the Hubble tension in this form