Comparing measures of the Hubble and BAO tensions in $\Lambda$CDM and possible solutions in $f(Q)$ gravity
Abstract
We test whether symmetric teleparallel gravity theories can solve the Hubble tension consistently with DESI DR2 BAO. We consider three functional forms: logarithmic, exponential, and hyperbolic tangent. We extend these models by allowing a cosmological constant, and compare to phenomenological models with a flexible exponential, hyperbolic secant, and polynomial decay addition to the standard CDM . We test these models against DESI DR2 BAO, CMB ( 2018 + SPT-3G + ACT DR6), local , and Cosmic Chronometer data. The logarithmic and hyperbolic tangent models do not provide an adequate solution, but the exponential model does. Furthermore, it slightly reduces the parameter space tension between CMB and BAO datasets to , down from for CDM. Although CDM faces only tension in DESI data space, the higher tension in parameter space suggests a real anomaly. The models assisted by the cosmological constant perform slightly better still, at the cost of undermined theoretical motivation. They also perform poorly once local measurements are included. The phenomenological models fit all data reasonably well, yet the best-fitting models predict isotropically averaged BAO distances exceeding the DESI DR2 measurements at all redshifts. This highlights the difficulties of finding a theoretically motivated solution to the Hubble tension while remaining consistent with BAO data.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2510.20964,
title = {Comparing measures of the Hubble and BAO tensions in $\Lambda$CDM and possible solutions in $f(Q)$ gravity},
author = {José Antonio Nájera and Indranil Banik and Harry Desmond and Vasileios Kalaitzidis},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20964},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
32 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables. Published in Galaxies special issue on the Hubble tension in this form