English

Comparative study of magnetocaloric properties for Gd$^{3+}$ compounds with different frustrated lattice geometries

Strongly Correlated Electrons 2023-03-06 v1 Materials Science

Abstract

As materials with suppressed ordering temperatures and enhanced ground state entropies, frustrated magnetic oxides are ideal candidates for cryogenic magnetocaloric refrigeration. While previous materials design has focused on tuning the magnetic moments, their interactions, and density of moments on the lattice, there has been relatively little attention to frustrated lattices. Prior theoretical work has shown that the magnetocaloric cooling rate at the saturation field is proportional to a macroscopic number of soft mode excitations that arise due to the classical ground state degeneracy. The number of these modes is directly determined by the geometry of the frustrating lattice. For corner-sharing geometries, the pyrochlore has 50\% more modes than the garnet and kagome lattices, whereas the edge-sharing \emph{fcc} has only a subextensive number of soft modes. Here, we study the role of soft modes in the magnetocaloric effect of four large-spin Gd3+^{3+} (L=0L=0, J=S=7/2J=S=7/2) Heisenberg antiferromagnets on a kagome, garnet, pyrochlore, and \emph{fcc} lattice. By comparing measurements of the magnetic entropy change ΔSm\Delta S_m of these materials at fields up to 99~T with predictions using mean-field theory and Monte Carlo simulations, we are able to understand the relative importance of spin correlations and quantization effects. We observe that tuning the value of the nearest neighbor coupling has a more dominant contribution to the magnetocaloric entropy change in the liquid-He cooling regime (22-2020~K), rather than tuning the number of soft mode excitations. Our results inform future materials design in terms of dimensionality, degree of magnetic frustration, and lattice geometry.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2303.01773,
  title  = {Comparative study of magnetocaloric properties for Gd$^{3+}$ compounds with different frustrated lattice geometries},
  author = {EliseAnne C. Koskelo and Paromita Mukherjee and Cheng Liu and Alice C. Sackville Hamilton and Harapan S. Ong and M. E. Zhitomirsky and Claudio Castelnovo and Siân E. Dutton},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01773},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

15 pages, 14 figures