English

Comparative Study of Learning Outcomes for Online Learning Platforms

Computers and Society 2021-04-19 v1 Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Personalization and active learning are key aspects to successful learning. These aspects are important to address in intelligent educational applications, as they help systems to adapt and close the gap between students with varying abilities, which becomes increasingly important in the context of online and distance learning. We run a comparative head-to-head study of learning outcomes for two popular online learning platforms: Platform A, which follows a traditional model delivering content over a series of lecture videos and multiple-choice quizzes, and Platform B, which creates a personalized learning environment and provides problem-solving exercises and personalized feedback. We report on the results of our study using pre- and post-assessment quizzes with participants taking courses on an introductory data science topic on two platforms. We observe a statistically significant increase in the learning outcomes on Platform B, highlighting the impact of well-designed and well-engineered technology supporting active learning and problem-based learning in online education. Moreover, the results of the self-assessment questionnaire, where participants reported on perceived learning gains, suggest that participants using Platform B improve their metacognition.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2104.07763,
  title  = {Comparative Study of Learning Outcomes for Online Learning Platforms},
  author = {Francois St-Hilaire and Nathan Burns and Robert Belfer and Muhammad Shayan and Ariella Smofsky and Dung Do Vu and Antoine Frau and Joseph Potochny and Farid Faraji and Vincent Pavero and Neroli Ko and Ansona Onyi Ching and Sabina Elkins and Anush Stepanyan and Adela Matajova and Laurent Charlin and Yoshua Bengio and Iulian Vlad Serban and Ekaterina Kochmar},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07763},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

14 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, accepted at AIED 2021 (2021 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education)

R2 v1 2026-06-24T01:13:17.347Z