English

Comparative Evaluation of Recent Universal Adversarial Perturbations in Image Classification

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2023-06-21 v1

Abstract

The vulnerability of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to adversarial samples has recently garnered significant attention in the machine learning community. Furthermore, recent studies have unveiled the existence of universal adversarial perturbations (UAPs) that are image-agnostic and highly transferable across different CNN models. In this survey, our primary focus revolves around the recent advancements in UAPs specifically within the image classification task. We categorize UAPs into two distinct categories, i.e., noise-based attacks and generator-based attacks, thereby providing a comprehensive overview of representative methods within each category. By presenting the computational details of these methods, we summarize various loss functions employed for learning UAPs. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of different loss functions within consistent training frameworks, including noise-based and generator-based. The evaluation covers a wide range of attack settings, including black-box and white-box attacks, targeted and untargeted attacks, as well as the examination of defense mechanisms. Our quantitative evaluation results yield several important findings pertaining to the effectiveness of different loss functions, the selection of surrogate CNN models, the impact of training data and data size, and the training frameworks involved in crafting universal attackers. Finally, to further promote future research on universal adversarial attacks, we provide some visualizations of the perturbations and discuss the potential research directions.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2306.11261,
  title  = {Comparative Evaluation of Recent Universal Adversarial Perturbations in Image Classification},
  author = {Juanjuan Weng and Zhiming Luo and Dazhen Lin and Shaozi Li},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11261},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

18 pages,8 figures, 7 tables

R2 v1 2026-06-28T11:09:14.508Z