Comparative Assessment of Look-Ahead Economic Dispatch and Ramp Products for Grid Flexibility
Abstract
High renewable penetration increases the frequency and magnitude of net-load ramps, stressing real-time flexibility. Two commonly deployed remedies are look-ahead economic dispatch (LAED) and ramp products (RPs), yet their operational equivalence under the industry-standard rolling-window dispatch implementation is not well understood. This paper develops linear optimization models for multi-interval LAED and RP-based co-optimization, and proves that an enhanced RP formulation can match LAED's dispatch feasible region at a single time step when additional intertemporal deliverability constraints are enforced. We then show that this equivalence does not generally persist under rolling-window operation because LAED and RP formulations optimize different intertemporal objectives, leading to divergent end-of-window states. Using different test systems under stressed ramping conditions and multiple load levels, we show LAED achieves similar or lower load shedding than RP implementations with the same look-ahead horizon, with the most pronounced differences under high-load, ramp-limited conditions. The study highlights the limitations of current ramp product implementations and suggests enhancements, such as introducing more mid-duration RPs.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2601.22120,
title = {Comparative Assessment of Look-Ahead Economic Dispatch and Ramp Products for Grid Flexibility},
author = {Qian Zhang and Le Xie and Long Zhao and Congcong Wang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22120},
year = {2026}
}