Comment on `Oxygen vacancy-induced magnetic moment in edge-sharing CuO$_{2}$ chains of Li$_{2}$CuO$_{2}$'
Abstract
In a recent work devoted to the magnetism of LiCuO, Shu et al. [New J. Phys. 19 (2017) 023026] have proposed a "simplified" unfrustrated microscopic model that differs considerably from the models refined through decades of prior work. We show that the proposed model is at odds with known experimental data, including the reported magnetic susceptibility data up to 550~K. Using an 8 order high-temperature expansion for , we show that the experimental data for LiCuO are consistent with the prior model derived from inelastic neutron scattering (INS) studies. We also establish the -range of validity for a Curie-Weiss law for the real frustrated magnetic system. We argue that the knowledge of the long-range ordered magnetic structure for and of in a restricted -range provides insufficient information to extract all of the relevant couplings in frustrated magnets; the saturation field and INS data must also be used to determine several exchange couplings, including the weak but decisive frustrating antiferromagnetic (AFM) interchain couplings.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1708.06335,
title = {Comment on `Oxygen vacancy-induced magnetic moment in edge-sharing CuO$_{2}$ chains of Li$_{2}$CuO$_{2}$'},
author = {R. O. Kuzian and R. Klingeler and W. E. A. Lorenz and N. Wizent and S. Nishimoto and U. Nitzsche and H. Rosner and D. Milosavljevic and L. Hozoi and R. Yadav and J. Richter and A. Hauser and J. Geck and R. Hayn and V. Yushankhai and L. Siurakshina and C. Monney and T. Schmitt and J. Thar and G. Roth and T. Ito and H. Yamaguchi and M. Matsuda and S. Johnston and J. Malek and S-L. Drechsler},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06335},
year = {2018}
}
Comments
12 pages, 1 figure. Two authors and one reference added as well as slightly changed wording and style (two footnotes added). Short note on the Authors's Reply and Corrigendum is added as well