Collaborative Rational Speech Act: Pragmatic Reasoning for Multi-Turn Dialog
Abstract
As AI systems take on collaborative roles, they must reason about shared goals and beliefs-not just generate fluent language. The Rational Speech Act (RSA) framework offers a principled approach to pragmatic reasoning, but existing extensions face challenges in scaling to multi-turn, collaborative scenarios. In this paper, we introduce Collaborative Rational Speech Act (CRSA), an information-theoretic (IT) extension of RSA that models multi-turn dialog by optimizing a gain function adapted from rate-distortion theory. This gain is an extension of the gain model that is maximized in the original RSA model but takes into account the scenario in which both agents in a conversation have private information and produce utterances conditioned on the dialog. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CRSA on referential games and template-based doctor-patient dialogs in the medical domain. Empirical results show that CRSA yields more consistent, interpretable, and collaborative behavior than existing baselines-paving the way for more pragmatic and socially aware language agents.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2507.14063,
title = {Collaborative Rational Speech Act: Pragmatic Reasoning for Multi-Turn Dialog},
author = {Lautaro Estienne and Gabriel Ben Zenou and Nona Naderi and Jackie Cheung and Pablo Piantanida},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14063},
year = {2025}
}