English

CLASH-VLT: Constraining deviation from GR with the mass profiles of nine massive galaxy clusters

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2025-09-23 v1 General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract

We investigate the anisotropic stress parameter, η=Ψ/Φ\eta=\Psi/\Phi, defined as the ratio of the gravitational potentials in the linearly perturbed Friedmann-Lema\^itre Robertson-Walker metric, as a probe of deviations from general relativity across astrophysical to cosmological scales. Using mass profiles reconstructed from high-precision lensing and kinematics of nine galaxy clusters from the CLASH-VLT sample, we derive η(r)\eta(r) as a function of the radial distance from the cluster centres, over the range [0.1Mpc,1.2r200L][0.1 \,\text{Mpc},1.2\,r_{200}^L], where r200Lr_{200}^L is virial radius best-fit from lensing data. When using a Navarro-Frenk-White or an Hernquist profile to model the total matter distribution, we find consistency with general relativity (η=1\eta = 1) within 2σ2\sigma for the full radial range for all the sampled clusters. However, adopting a Burkert profile introduces mild tension with general relativity, reaching the 3σ3\sigma level in two systems. Assuming a negligible time-dependence in the redshift range spawned by the clusters, we obtain the joint constraint η(r=1.0Mpc)=0.930.40+0.48\eta (r= 1.0 \, \text{Mpc}) = 0.93^{+0.48}_{-0.40} (stat) ±0.47\pm 0.47 (syst) at 95%95\% confidence level -- an improvement of approximately 40%40\% over previous estimates. We discuss the impact of systematics on the constraints, and we highlight the implications of this result for current and upcoming cluster surveys.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2509.16317,
  title  = {CLASH-VLT: Constraining deviation from GR with the mass profiles of nine massive galaxy clusters},
  author = {L. Pizzuti and A. Biviano and K. Umetsu and E. Agostoni and A. Autorino and A. M. Pombo and A. Mercurio and M. D'Addona},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.16317},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

18 pages plus appendix, 11 figures, submitted to JCAP