Citrine Informatics: Chemical & Materials Development Platform
Abstract
Data-driven materials discovery promises to compress the historically decades-long path from invention to deployment, yet translating individual successes into sustained industrial discovery programs remains difficult. Three obstacles recur: experimental data are scarce, costly, and published in formats that resist reuse; conventional accuracy metrics overstate model performance under the extrapolative conditions that define discovery; and realistic design spaces are bounded by physics, manufacturability, supply, and cost. We present the Citrine Platform, developed over more than a decade as an integrated response to these obstacles, and organize it as four cooperating stages within a closed sequential learning loop. Stage 1 ingests and featurizes data through the Graphical Expression of Materials Data (GEMD) model, which treats process history, measurement uncertainty, and provenance as first-class features. Stage 2 builds machine learning models with well-calibrated uncertainty, including multivariate prediction intervals for correlated objectives, and validates them with extrapolative cross-validation and dynamic discovery metrics rather than random held-out splits. Stage 3 encodes compositional, physical, processing, and economic constraints directly into the design space, and Stage 4 applies the FUELS sequential learning framework with uncertainty-aware acquisition functions to navigate large constrained spaces under tight evaluation budgets. Published case studies spanning organic semiconductors, autonomous nanoparticle synthesis, and benchmark optimization tasks demonstrate two- to nine-fold reductions in experimental effort relative to random search, illustrating a stack in which data, modeling, and design-space layers continuously co-evolve.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2607.25039,
title = {Citrine Informatics: Chemical & Materials Development Platform},
author = {Maxwell C. Venetos and Steven J. Brown and Kenneth Kroenlein and Steven K. Kauwe and James E. Saal and Marco Musto and Matthew D. Gerboth and Kyle D. Miller and Gregory J. Mulholland},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.25039},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
61 pages, 9 figures