The recent success of large language models and AI chatbots such as ChatGPT in various knowledge domains has a severe impact on teaching and learning Geography and GIScience. The underlying revolution is often compared to the introduction of pocket calculators, suggesting analogous adaptations that prioritize higher-level skills over other learning content. However, using ChatGPT can be fraudulent because it threatens the validity of assessments. The success of such a strategy therefore rests on the assumption that lower-level learning goals are substitutable by AI, and supervision and assessments can be refocused on higher-level goals. Based on a preliminary survey on ChatGPT's quality in answering questions in Geography and GIScience, we demonstrate that this assumption might be fairly naive, and effective control in assessments and supervision is required.
@article{arxiv.2307.03196,
title = {ChatGPT is not a pocket calculator -- Problems of AI-chatbots for teaching Geography},
author = {Simon Scheider and Harm Bartholomeus and Judith Verstegen},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03196},
year = {2023}
}