English

Chasing the beginning of reionization in the JWST era

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2025-05-15 v2 Astrophysics of Galaxies

Abstract

Recent JWST observations at z>6z > 6 may imply galactic ionizing photon production above prior expectations. Under observationally motivated assumptions about escape fractions, these suggest a z89z \sim 8-9 end to reionization, in tension with the z<6z < 6 end required by the Lyα\alpha forest. In this work, we use radiative transfer simulations to understand what different observations tell us about when reionization ended and when it started. We consider a model that ends too early (zend8z_{\rm end} \approx 8) alongside two more realistic scenarios with zend5z_{\rm end} \approx 5: one starting late (z9z \sim 9) and another early (z13z \sim 13). We find that the latter requires up to an order-of-magnitude evolution in galaxy ionizing properties at 6<z<126 < z < 12, perhaps in tension with measurements of ξion\xi_{\rm ion} by JWST, which indicate little evolution. We study how these models compare to recent measurements of the Lyα\alpha forest opacity, mean free path, IGM thermal history, visibility of z>8z > 8 Lyα\alpha emitters, and the patchy kSZ signal from the CMB. We find that neither of the late-ending scenarios is strongly disfavored by any single data set. However, a majority of observables, spanning several distinct types of observations, prefer a late start. Not all probes agree with this conclusion, hinting at a possible lack of concordance arising from deficiencies in observations and/or theoretical modeling. Observations by multiple experiments (including JWST, Roman, and CMB-S4) in the coming years will establish a concordance picture of reionization's beginning or uncover such deficiencies.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2409.02989,
  title  = {Chasing the beginning of reionization in the JWST era},
  author = {Christopher Cain and Garett Lopez and Anson D'Aloisio and Julian B. Munoz and Rolf A. Jansen and Rogier A. Windhorst and Nakul Gangolli},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02989},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

21+7 pages, 13+2 figures, accepted in ApJ. Comments welcome