Certification and the Potential Energy Landscape
Abstract
Typically, there is no guarantee that a numerical approximation obtained using standard nonlinear equation solvers is indeed an actual solution, meaning that it lies in the quadratic convergence basin. Instead, it may lie only in the linear convergence basin, or even in a chaotic region, and hence not converge to the corresponding stationary point when further optimization is attempted. In some cases, these non-solutions could be misleading. Proving that a numerical approximation will quadratically converge to a stationary point is termed \textit{certification}. In this report, we provide details of how Smale's -theory can be used to certify numerically obtained stationary points of a potential energy landscape, providing a \textit{mathematical proof} that the numerical approximation does indeed correspond to an actual stationary point, independent of the precision employed.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1407.4762,
title = {Certification and the Potential Energy Landscape},
author = {Dhagash Mehta and Jonathan D. Hauenstein and David J. Wales},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.4762},
year = {2014}
}
Comments
7 pages, 4 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1302.6265