English

Central gas entropy excess as a direct evidence for AGN feedback in galaxy groups and clusters

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2015-05-19 v1

Abstract

By analyzing Chandra X-ray data of a sample of 21 galaxy groups and 19 galaxy clusters, we find that in 31 sample systems there exists a significant central (R<10h711R^{<}_{\sim} 10h_{71}^{-1} kpc) gas entropy excess (ΔK0\Delta K_{0}), which corresponds to 0.10.5\simeq 0.1-0.5 keV per gas particle, beyond the power-law model that best fits the radial entropy profile of outer regions. We also find a distinct correlation between the central entropy excess ΔK0\Delta K_{0} and KK-band luminosity LKL_{K} of the central dominating galaxies (CDGs), which is scaled as ΔK0LK1.6±0.4\Delta K_{0} \propto L_{K}^{1.6\pm0.4}, where LKL_{K} is tightly associated with the mass of the supermassive black hole hosted in the CDG. In fact, if an effective mass-to-energy conversion-efficiency of 0.02 is assumed for the accretion process, the cumulative AGN feedback EfeedbackAGNηMBHc2E^{\rm AGN}_{\rm feedback} \simeq \eta M_{\rm BH}c^{2} yields an extra heating of 0.517.0\simeq 0.5-17.0 keV per particle, which is sufficient to explain the central entropy excess. In most cases the AGN contribution can compensate the radiative loss of the X-ray gas within the cooling radius (0.0022.2\simeq 0.002-2.2 keV per particle), and apparently exceeds the energy required to deviate the scaling relations from the self-similar predictions (0.21.0\simeq 0.2-1.0 keV per particle). In contrast to the AGN feedback, the extra heating provided by supernova explosions accounts for 0.010.08\simeq 0.01-0.08 keV per particle in groups and is almost negligible in clusters. Therefore, the observed correlation between ΔK0\Delta K_{0} and LKL_{K} can be considered as a direct evidence for AGN feedback in galaxy groups and clusters.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1006.3381,
  title  = {Central gas entropy excess as a direct evidence for AGN feedback in galaxy groups and clusters},
  author = {Yu Wang and Haiguang Xu and Junhua Gu and Liyi Gu and Jingying Wang and Zhongli Zhang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1006.3381},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

14 pages, 3 figures, accepted by RAA