English

CC30k: A Citation Contexts Dataset for Reproducibility-Oriented Sentiment Analysis

Digital Libraries 2025-11-12 v1 Computation and Language

Abstract

Sentiments about the reproducibility of cited papers in downstream literature offer community perspectives and have shown as a promising signal of the actual reproducibility of published findings. To train effective models to effectively predict reproducibility-oriented sentiments and further systematically study their correlation with reproducibility, we introduce the CC30k dataset, comprising a total of 30,734 citation contexts in machine learning papers. Each citation context is labeled with one of three reproducibility-oriented sentiment labels: Positive, Negative, or Neutral, reflecting the cited paper's perceived reproducibility or replicability. Of these, 25,829 are labeled through crowdsourcing, supplemented with negatives generated through a controlled pipeline to counter the scarcity of negative labels. Unlike traditional sentiment analysis datasets, CC30k focuses on reproducibility-oriented sentiments, addressing a research gap in resources for computational reproducibility studies. The dataset was created through a pipeline that includes robust data cleansing, careful crowd selection, and thorough validation. The resulting dataset achieves a labeling accuracy of 94%. We then demonstrated that the performance of three large language models significantly improves on the reproducibility-oriented sentiment classification after fine-tuning using our dataset. The dataset lays the foundation for large-scale assessments of the reproducibility of machine learning papers. The CC30k dataset and the Jupyter notebooks used to produce and analyze the dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/lamps-lab/CC30k .

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2511.07790,
  title  = {CC30k: A Citation Contexts Dataset for Reproducibility-Oriented Sentiment Analysis},
  author = {Rochana R. Obadage and Sarah M. Rajtmajer and Jian Wu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07790},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Peer reviewed and accepted at JCDL 2025, 16 pages, 7 figures

R2 v1 2026-07-01T07:31:09.734Z