Causal Relationship: a new tool for the causal characterization of Lorentzian manifolds
Abstract
We define and study a new kind of relation between two diffeomorphic Lorentzian manifolds called {\em causal relation}, which is any diffeomorphism characterized by mapping every causal vector of the first manifold onto a causal vector of the second. We perform a thorough study of the mathematical properties of causal relations and prove in particular that two given Lorentzian manifolds (say and ) may be causally related only in one direction (say from to , but not from to ). This leads us to the concept of causally equivalent (or {\em isocausal} in short) Lorentzian manifolds as those mutually causally related. This concept is more general and of a more basic nature than the conformal relationship, because we prove the remarkable result that a conformal relation is characterized by the fact of being a causal relation of the {\em particular} kind in which both and are causal relations. For isocausal Lorentzian manifolds there are one-to-one correspondences, which sometimes are non-trivial, between several classes of their respective future (and past) objects. A more important feature of isocausal Lorentzian manifolds is that they satisfy the same causality constraints. This indicates that the causal equivalence provides a possible characterization of the {\it basic causal structure}, in the sense of mutual causal compatibility, for Lorentzian manifolds. Thus, we introduce a partial order for the equivalence classes of isocausal Lorentzian manifolds providing a classification of spacetimes in terms of their causal properties, and a classification of all the causal structures that a given fixed manifold can have. A full abstract inside the paper.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.gr-qc/0207110,
title = {Causal Relationship: a new tool for the causal characterization of Lorentzian manifolds},
author = {Alfonso García-Parrado and José M M Senovilla},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:gr-qc/0207110},
year = {2016}
}
Comments
47 pages, 10 figures. Version to appear in Classical and Quantum Gravity